[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfJiihM6e30_seMpQ5EjdgrPW4Zhw-V-yMC3iNfAt6Bd4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:25:50 -0800
From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Fix too strict alignment check in create_cache()
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:30 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> Do we really need to continue supporting nommu machines ? Is anyone
> but me even boot testing those ?
I do rather regular boot tests on nommu xtensa (esp32, esp32-s3).
--
Thanks.
-- Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists