linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Revise Meta(Facebook) Harma BMC(AST2600)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <920e053a17d5f9a7d5805bcd674f036a9c7fb402.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:27:08 +1030
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
To: PeterYin <peteryin.openbmc@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
  Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, 
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
 linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Revise Meta(Facebook) Harma BMC(AST2600)

Hi Peter,

On Thu, 2024-11-21 at 12:33 +0800, PeterYin wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>    I believe this series' path will conflict with upstream due to 
> version differences between OpenBMC and upstream. I will update to
> the 
> latest version of the DTS from upstream and submit a new version 
> accordingly.

Going forward, please make sure that patches you send upstream have
been tested on upstream (in terms of whether they apply to the
appropriate branch, and whether they have the right effect on the
system at runtime).

Andrew