linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] execve updates for v6.13-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b439fc9a-e0e7-4643-88be-6ffb85fc0136@skogtun.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:21:57 +0100
From: Harald Arnesen <linux@...gtun.org>
To: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@...waw.pl>,
 "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] execve updates for v6.13-rc1

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2024-11-22 08:47:30]:

>> I do not see any evidence that there are daemons started by systemd
>> where systemd follows the name in /etc/alternatives on debian, or winds
>> up following a symlink on a multicall binary.  The way I understand
>> /etc/alternatives I don't think you would ever want to use it for the
>> name of a daemon that is put in a unit file.

> systemd-udevd is one example that ~everybody has installed.
> (Though it doesn't use comm, it uses argv[0] to decide behaviour.)

There are quite a few of us who do NOT have systemd-udevd (or anything 
systemd) installed.
-- 
Hilsen Harald