lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xhsmh7c8v9xt9.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:56:34 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 x86@...nel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas Gleixner
 <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov
 <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter
 Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Wanpeng Li
 <wanpengli@...cent.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Andy
 Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Neeraj Upadhyay
 <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Josh
 Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Lai Jiangshan
 <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Lorenzo Stoakes
 <lstoakes@...il.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Jason Baron
 <jbaron@...mai.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Sami Tolvanen
 <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Nicholas
 Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Juerg Haefliger
 <juerg.haefliger@...onical.com>, Nicolas Saenz Julienne
 <nsaenz@...nel.org>, "Kirill A. Shutemov"
 <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Dan
 Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@...il.com>, Yang
 Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, "Jason A.
 Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Julian Pidancet
 <julian.pidancet@...cle.com>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
 Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, Thomas Weißschuh
 <linux@...ssschuh.net>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Marcelo
 Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@...hat.com>, Daniel
 Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/15] rcu: Add a small-width RCU watching
 counter debug option

On 22/11/24 04:53, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:34:51PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> +config RCU_DYNTICKS_TORTURE
>> +	bool "Minimize RCU dynticks counter size"
>> +	depends on RCU_EXPERT
>> +	default n
>> +	help
>> +	  This option controls the width of the dynticks counter.
>> +
>> +	  Lower values will make overflows more frequent, which will increase
>> +	  the likelihood of extending grace-periods. This option sets the width
>> +	  to its minimum usable value.
>
> The second sentence ("Lower values ...") sounds at first reading like
> this Kconfig option directly controls the width.  The third sentence sets
> things straight, but the reader might well be irretrievably confused by
> that point.  How about something like this instead?
>
>       help
>         This option sets the width of the dynticks counter to its
>         minimum usable value.  This minimum width greatly increases
>         the probability of flushing out bugs involving counter wrap,
>         but it also increases the probability of extending grace period
>         durations.  This Kconfig option should therefore be avoided in
>         production due to the consequent increased probability of OOMs.
>
>         This has no value for production and is only for testing.
>

Much better, I'll take that, thank you!

>>  endmenu # "RCU Debugging"
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ