lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8645b6c-7f78-4051-9e29-2276197714ed@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:55:20 +0800
From: "Cheng Jiang (IOE)" <quic_chejiang@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz
	<luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        "Balakrishna
 Godavarthi" <quic_bgodavar@...cinc.com>,
        Rocky Liao
	<quic_rjliao@...cinc.com>, <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_mohamull@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: bluetooth: Add qca6698 compatible
 string

Hi Dmitry,

On 11/22/2024 12:28 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 06:12, Cheng Jiang <quic_chejiang@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> On 11/20/2024 6:44 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:54:26PM +0800, Cheng Jiang wrote:
>>>> Add QCA6698 qcom,qca6698-bt compatible strings.
>>>
>>> Why? Is it the same chip as WCN6855 or a different chip? Is it
>>> completely compatible?
>>>
>> They are different chips. But it's compatible with WCN6855.
> 
> So, do we really need new compat? Will/can it use the same firmware?
We need to use a different firmware. Let me check if using 
"firmware-name" allows us to omit the new soc type. 
>From the driver's perspective, the only change is the need to load a 
different firmware.

> 
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <quic_chejiang@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml   | 2 ++
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml
>>>> index 9019fe7bcdc6..527f947289af 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml
>>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
>>>>      enum:
>>>>        - qcom,qca2066-bt
>>>>        - qcom,qca6174-bt
>>>> +      - qcom,qca6698-bt
>>>>        - qcom,qca9377-bt
>>>>        - qcom,wcn3988-bt
>>>>        - qcom,wcn3990-bt
>>>> @@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ allOf:
>>>>          compatible:
>>>>            contains:
>>>>              enum:
>>>> +              - qcom,qca6698-bt
>>>>                - qcom,wcn6855-bt
>>>>      then:
>>>>        required:
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ