[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241122164714.aj4dzv32zixdj7pq@thinkpad>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 22:17:14 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
Cc: "l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
"kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] PCI: imx6: Use dwc common suspend resume method
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:00:44AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
[...]
> > > -static void imx_pcie_pm_turnoff(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie) -{
> > > - struct device *dev = imx_pcie->pci->dev;
> > > -
> > > - /* Some variants have a turnoff reset in DT */
> > > - if (imx_pcie->turnoff_reset) {
> > > - reset_control_assert(imx_pcie->turnoff_reset);
> > > - reset_control_deassert(imx_pcie->turnoff_reset);
> >
> > Where these are handled in imx_pcie_pme_turn_off()? If you removed them
> > intentionally for a reason, it should be mentioned in commit message.
> >
> How about add the following descriptions into commit message?
> SRC interface is used to do the PME_TURN_OFF operations before. It's not very
What is SRC?
> suitable. Now DWC common driver can do the PME_TURN_OFF kick off. Switch to
> this common methods, and remove the useless turnoff_reset manipulate codes.
>
Hmm, so 'turnoff_reset' is used to send PME_Turn_Off msg?
If so, then you need to say in such a way that the reader should understand
'turnoff_reset' was used to send PME_Turn_Off and since the DWC implementation
is used, it is not needed now.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists