[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241123094729.1099378-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 10:47:27 +0100
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de,
bp@...en8.de,
andy@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] retire bcmp, a redundant wrapper around memcmp
Reasoning copied from patch 2:
> While architectures could override it thanks to __HAVE_ARCH_BCMP, none
> of them did. Instead it was implemented as a call to memcmp().
> These routines differ in the API contract: memcmp()'s result indicates
> which way the difference goes (making it usable for sorting), whereas
> bcmp()'s result merely states whether the buffers differ in any way.
> This means that a dedicated optimized bcmp() is cheaper to execute than
> memcmp() for differing buffers as there is no need to compute the return
> value.
> However, per the above nobody bothered to write one and it is unclear if
> it makes sense to do it.
> Users which really want to compare stuff may want to handle it
> differently (like e.g., the path lookup).
Mateusz Guzik (2):
x86/callthunks: s/bcmp/memcmp/
string: retire bcmp()
arch/x86/boot/string.c | 8 --------
arch/x86/boot/string.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c | 6 +++---
include/linux/string.h | 3 ---
lib/Makefile | 3 +--
lib/string.c | 19 -------------------
6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists