[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <277AB18F-2DCF-46C0-92EE-7519196CDF60@bootlin.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 10:45:42 +0000
From: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Ian Forbes <ian.forbes@...adcom.com>
CC: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>,
Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, arthurgrillo@...eup.net,
jeremie.dautheribes@...tlin.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, seanpaul@...gle.com, nicolejadeyee@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 17/18] drm/vkms: Introduce config for connector EDID
Le 22 novembre 2024 21:28:00 UTC, Ian Forbes <ian.forbes@...adcom.com> a écrit :
>I didn't see a `drm_connector_attach_edid_property` call in this
>series. Did you forget this? Virtual connectors don't have this
>property by default.
Hello Ian,
You are right; I did not call this function. As mainly tested with the DP connector type, I never had any issue. I need to check if calling `drm_edid_connector_update` fails if the EDID property does not exist.
Thanks,
Louis Chauvet
>Ian,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists