[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241123132150.GE24774@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:21:50 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] objtool: Rewrite annotations
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 09:40:56AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Just the objtool annotation rewrite bits.
> >
> > Changes since last time:
> >
> > - split from the x86 and kvm patches
> > - s/ANNOTYPE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALLS/ANNOTYPE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL/g
> > - made __ASM_ANNOTATE() take a full label name (no longer appends 'b')
> > - added a patch that moves all the annotations to objtool.h
> > - some changes to the first patch
>
> For Valentin's thing we'll be adding annotations for static keys. Those
> will be symbol specific, like STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(). In which case
> we could have a generic .discard.annotate_sym. And then rename
> .discard.annotate to .discard.annotate_insn?
Done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists