lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh0GvCCyuK7hG9MkXPrDTSPU1qFaQZm5GVL=Tc0BzN49w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:40:20 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, 
	Hao-ran Zheng <zhenghaoran@...a.edu.cn>, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	baijiaju1990@...il.com, 21371365@...a.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [RFC] metadata updates vs. fetches (was Re: [PATCH v4] fs: Fix
 data race in inode_set_ctime_to_ts)

On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 at 14:24, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 02:10:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > I *do* think that we could perhaps extend (and rename) the
> > inode->i_size_seqcount to just cover all of the core inode metadata
> > stuff.
>
> That would bring ->i_size_seqcount to 64bit architectures and
> potentially extend the time it's being held quite a bit even
> on 32bit...

Yes. But it seems fairly benign.

*IF* somebody really cares, that is.

         Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ