linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: samsung,atna56ac03: Document ATNA56AC03

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <VE1P189MB1024FED800B8291EFAA52B15E32D2@VE1P189MB1024.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:29:02 +0100
From: Maud Spierings <maud_spierings@...mail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Douglas Anderson
 <dianders@...omium.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: samsung,atna56ac03:
 Document ATNA56AC03

On 11/24/24 12:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 11:00:57AM +0100, Maud Spierings wrote:
>> The Samsung ATNA56AC03 panel is an AMOLED eDP panel.
>> It is similar to the ATNA33xc20 except it is larger and has a different
>> resolution.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maud Spierings <maud_spierings@...mail.com>
>> ---
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add
> Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions, under
> or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided
> in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help
> here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags.
> The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version
> they apply.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
I did indeed completely miss it, only focussed on the correction, Should 
I make a new version?
Also this is my first time replying on the list so I hope this goes well.

When I add one of these tags it should be in the commit message of that 
patch below three dashes?


Best regards,
Maud