[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxhmzShcqBjY-HhHH7JhSpxJ9BVGe1H6C3w-=FcH_fUJQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:59:40 +0100
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/26] ovl: avoid pointless cred reference count bump
On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 2:44 PM Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> No need for the extra reference count bump.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> index 439bd9a5ceecc4d2f4dc5dfda7cea14c3d9411ba..39f08531abc7e99c32e709a46988939f072a9abe 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> @@ -741,17 +741,15 @@ static int ovl_prep_cu_creds(struct dentry *dentry, struct ovl_cu_creds *cc)
> return err;
>
> if (cc->new)
> - cc->old = override_creds(get_new_cred(cc->new));
> + cc->old = override_creds(cc->new);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void ovl_revert_cu_creds(struct ovl_cu_creds *cc)
> {
> - if (cc->new) {
> + if (cc->new)
> put_cred(revert_creds(cc->old));
> - put_cred(cc->new);
> - }
Same comment here, I think this will read more clearly as
revert_creds(cc->old));
put_cred(cc->new);
and better reflects the counterpart of ovl_prep_cu_creds().
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists