[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vfbklrbereo3j5dp2w4pvctef364sb2dqogccmaevjerkm5u43@jytwobqwvuv2>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:46:37 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/msm/adreno: Introduce ADRENO_QUIRK_NO_SYSCACHE
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 10:03:00PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> There are a few chipsets which don't have system cache a.k.a LLC.
> Currently, the assumption in the driver is that the system cache
> availability correlates with the presence of GMU or RPMH, which
> is not true. For instance, Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 has RPMH and a GPU
> with a full blown GMU, but doesnot have a system cache. So,
> introduce an Adreno Quirk flag to check support for system cache
> instead of using gmu_wrapper flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 7 +------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> index 0c560e84ad5a..5e389f6b8b8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> @@ -682,6 +682,7 @@ static const struct adreno_info a6xx_gpus[] = {
> },
> .gmem = (SZ_128K + SZ_4K),
> .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
> + .quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_NO_SYSCACHE,
> .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
> .zapfw = "a610_zap.mdt",
> .a6xx = &(const struct a6xx_info) {
> @@ -1331,7 +1332,7 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> },
> .gmem = SZ_128K,
> .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
> - .quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV,
> + .quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV | ADRENO_QUIRK_NO_SYSCACHE,
> .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
> .zapfw = "a702_zap.mbn",
> .a6xx = &(const struct a6xx_info) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 019610341df1..a8b928d0f320 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -1863,10 +1863,6 @@ static void a7xx_llc_activate(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>
> static void a6xx_llc_slices_destroy(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> {
> - /* No LLCC on non-RPMh (and by extension, non-GMU) SoCs */
> - if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(&a6xx_gpu->base))
> - return;
> -
Shouldn't it also be a NO_SYSCACHE check?
> llcc_slice_putd(a6xx_gpu->llc_slice);
> llcc_slice_putd(a6xx_gpu->htw_llc_slice);
> }
> @@ -1876,8 +1872,7 @@ static void a6xx_llc_slices_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> {
> struct device_node *phandle;
>
> - /* No LLCC on non-RPMh (and by extension, non-GMU) SoCs */
> - if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(&a6xx_gpu->base))
> + if (a6xx_gpu->base.info->quirks & ADRENO_QUIRK_NO_SYSCACHE)
> return;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> index e71f420f8b3a..398be2218110 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ enum adreno_family {
> #define ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV BIT(3)
> #define ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_CACHED_COHERENT BIT(4)
> #define ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION BIT(5)
> +#define ADRENO_QUIRK_NO_SYSCACHE BIT(6)
>
> /* Helper for formating the chip_id in the way that userspace tools like
> * crashdec expect.
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists