linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 7/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark touchscreens and trackpads as fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXv+5H8YwiTyk1eMSwPLuGw5sQxec4n8OKR-Qa5wz8QGH4h9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:01:20 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, 
	chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, 
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, stable+noautosel@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark
 touchscreens and trackpads as fail

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 6:36 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 06/11/24 10:33, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> > Instead of having them all available, mark them all as "fail-needs-probe"
> > and have the implementation try to probe which one is present.
> >
> > Also remove the shared resource workaround by moving the pinctrl entry
> > for the trackpad interrupt line back into the individual trackpad nodes.
> >
> > Cc: <stable+noautosel@...nel.org> # Needs accompanying new driver to work
> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>

Hi Angelo,

Could Wolfram also take this patch instead of it having to wait another cycle?


Thanks
ChenYu