[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18721453-75dc-4350-a97f-38debc90639d@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 13:46:30 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <Usama.Anjum@...labora.com>
To: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
Cc: Usama.Anjum@...labora.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
nfraprado@...labora.com, robh@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com, Shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Warn about skipped tests in result summary
Hi Laura,
Thank you for making change.
On 11/22/24 11:19 PM, Shuah wrote:
> On 11/22/24 08:55, Laura Nao wrote:
>> Update the functions that print the test totals at the end of a selftest
>> to include a warning message when skipped tests are detected. The
>> message advises users that skipped tests may indicate missing
>> configuration options and suggests enabling them to improve coverage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> This patch follows up on a previous discussion[1] and aims to highlight
>> skipped tests for the user's attention.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2bb2d338-cd00-4ac2-b8bd-5579eae82637@linuxfoundation.org/
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 4 ++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py | 3 +++
>> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ktap_helpers.sh | 4 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
>> index 29fedf609611..d3f64b333acd 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
>> @@ -147,6 +147,10 @@ static inline void ksft_set_plan(unsigned int plan)
>> static inline void ksft_print_cnts(void)
>> {
>> + if (ksft_cnt.ksft_xskip > 0)
>> + printf(
>> + "# Skipped tests detected. Consider enabling relevant config options to improve coverage.\n"
Looks good. Printing the number of skipped tests would be an improvement.
I'm thinking about a case where some tests got failed and some skipped. Would
this warning be useful in that case?
>
> I like this. How about printing the number of skipped tests in this
> message also to make it easy to parse.
>
> Same comment on other print messages,
>
>> + );
>> if (ksft_plan != ksft_test_num())
>> printf("# Planned tests != run tests (%u != %u)\n",
>> ksft_plan, ksft_test_num());
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py
>> index bf215790a89d..7675a15a1264 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py
>> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ def set_plan(num_tests):
>> def print_cnts():
>> + if ksft_cnt['skip'] > 0:
>> + print("# Skipped tests detected. Consider enabling relevant config options to improve coverage.")
>> +
>> print(
>> f"# Totals: pass:{ksft_cnt['pass']} fail:{ksft_cnt['fail']} xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:{ksft_cnt['skip']} error:0"
>> )
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ktap_helpers.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ktap_helpers.sh
>> index 79a125eb24c2..a4211221ccd6 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ktap_helpers.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ktap_helpers.sh
>> @@ -107,5 +107,9 @@ ktap_finished() {
>> }
>> ktap_print_totals() {
>> + if [ "$KTAP_CNT_SKIP" -gt 0 ]; then
>> + echo "# Skipped tests detected. " \
>> + "Consider enabling relevant config options to improve coverage."
>> + fi
>> echo "# Totals: pass:$KTAP_CNT_PASS fail:$KTAP_CNT_FAIL xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:$KTAP_CNT_SKIP error:0"
>> }
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists