[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <310ec20b-3fbd-4c0f-8705-cff96bb6e4d3@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:14:55 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>, rfoss@...nel.org,
todor.too@...il.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] media: qcom: camss: Re-structure
camss_link_entities
On 25/11/2024 11:57, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Vikram,
>
> On 11/25/24 12:34, Vikram Sharma wrote:
>> Refactor the camss_link_entities function by breaking it down into
>> three distinct functions. Each function will handle the linking of
>> a specific entity separately, enhancing readability.
>>
>> Changes in V3:
>> - Broke down the change in 2 patches. first one to functionally
>> decompose link error message. second to restrcture the link
>> function.
>> - Removed the declarion of camss_link_error from header file.
>> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-
>> msm/20241112133846.2397017-1-quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com/
>
> as I said last time I don't see the value of these changes.
>
> Since the changes are non-functional, then hopefully there should be
> no issues with them, however I really miss the point of adding 65
> lines of code for a questionable reason and at the price of increased
> complexity.
>
> Is there a good reason not to drop the series?
I think there is value in both functional decomposition and tidying up
code - for example removing circuitous if/elses in favour of more
discreet and easy to read functions, so I'm inclined to accept this series.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists