lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ddf779148f44295acfbe547d9ec3aab@BJMBX02.spreadtrum.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 03:11:40 +0000
From: 王秀红 (Xiuhong Wang) <Xiuhong.Wang@...soc.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, "jaegeuk@...nel.org" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        牛志国 (Zhiguo Niu)
	<Zhiguo.Niu@...soc.com>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to shrink read extent node in batches

Hi Chao,

after tested in this weekend with these patch base on the orginal case, no issue reproduced, so
Tested-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@...soc.com>

thanks!

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org> 
发送时间: 2024年11月22日 14:50
收件人: jaegeuk@...nel.org
抄送: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>; 王秀红 (Xiuhong Wang) <Xiuhong.Wang@...soc.com>; 牛志国 (Zhiguo Niu) <Zhiguo.Niu@...soc.com>
主题: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to shrink read extent node in batches


注意: 这封邮件来自于外部。除非你确定邮件内容安全,否则不要点击任何链接和附件。
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.



We use rwlock to protect core structure data of extent tree during its shrink, however, if there is a huge number of extent nodes in extent tree, during shrink of extent tree, it may hold rwlock for a very long time, which may trigger kernel hang issue.

This patch fixes to shrink read extent node in batches, so that, critical region of the rwlock can be shrunk to avoid its extreme long time hold.

Reported-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@...soc.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20241112110627.1314632-1-xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com/
Signed-off-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@...soc.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@...soc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
---
v2:
- no updates.
 fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c index 019c1f7b7fa5..b7a6817b44b0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -379,21 +379,22 @@ static struct extent_tree *__grab_extent_tree(struct inode *inode,  }

 static unsigned int __free_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
-                                       struct extent_tree *et)
+                               struct extent_tree *et, unsigned int 
+ nr_shrink)
 {
        struct rb_node *node, *next;
        struct extent_node *en;
-       unsigned int count = atomic_read(&et->node_cnt);
+       unsigned int count;

        node = rb_first_cached(&et->root);
-       while (node) {
+
+       for (count = 0; node && count < nr_shrink; count++) {
                next = rb_next(node);
                en = rb_entry(node, struct extent_node, rb_node);
                __release_extent_node(sbi, et, en);
                node = next;
        }

-       return count - atomic_read(&et->node_cnt);
+       return count;
 }

 static void __drop_largest_extent(struct extent_tree *et, @@ -622,6 +623,30 @@ static struct extent_node *__insert_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
        return en;
 }

+static unsigned int __destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode,
+                                       enum extent_type type) {
+       struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
+       struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
+       unsigned int nr_shrink = type == EX_READ ?
+                               READ_EXTENT_CACHE_SHRINK_NUMBER :
+                               AGE_EXTENT_CACHE_SHRINK_NUMBER;
+       unsigned int node_cnt = 0;
+
+       if (!et || !atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
+               return 0;
+
+       while (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt)) {
+               write_lock(&et->lock);
+               node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et, nr_shrink);
+               write_unlock(&et->lock);
+       }
+
+       f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->node_cnt));
+
+       return node_cnt;
+}
+
 static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
                        struct extent_info *tei, enum extent_type type)  { @@ -760,9 +785,6 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
                }
        }

-       if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT))
-               __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
-
        if (et->largest_updated) {
                et->largest_updated = false;
                updated = true;
@@ -780,6 +802,9 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
 out_read_extent_cache:
        write_unlock(&et->lock);

+       if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT))
+               __destroy_extent_node(inode, EX_READ);
+
        if (updated)
                f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);  } @@ -942,10 +967,14 @@ static unsigned int __shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink
        list_for_each_entry_safe(et, next, &eti->zombie_list, list) {
                if (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt)) {
                        write_lock(&et->lock);
-                       node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
+                       node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et,
+                                       nr_shrink - node_cnt - 
+ tree_cnt);
                        write_unlock(&et->lock);
                }
-               f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->node_cnt));
+
+               if (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
+                       goto unlock_out;
+
                list_del_init(&et->list);
                radix_tree_delete(&eti->extent_tree_root, et->ino);
                kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et); @@ -1084,23 +1113,6 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_age_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink
        return __shrink_extent_tree(sbi, nr_shrink, EX_BLOCK_AGE);  }

-static unsigned int __destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode,
-                                       enum extent_type type)
-{
-       struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
-       struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
-       unsigned int node_cnt = 0;
-
-       if (!et || !atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
-               return 0;
-
-       write_lock(&et->lock);
-       node_cnt = __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
-       write_unlock(&et->lock);
-
-       return node_cnt;
-}
-
 void f2fs_destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode)  {
        __destroy_extent_node(inode, EX_READ); @@ -1109,7 +1121,6 @@ void f2fs_destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode)

 static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)  {
-       struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
        struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
        bool updated = false;

@@ -1117,7 +1128,6 @@ static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
                return;

        write_lock(&et->lock);
-       __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
        if (type == EX_READ) {
                set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT);
                if (et->largest.len) {
@@ -1126,6 +1136,9 @@ static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
                }
        }
        write_unlock(&et->lock);
+
+       __destroy_extent_node(inode, type);
+
        if (updated)
                f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);  }
--
2.40.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ