[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241125115039.1809353-4-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:50:39 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: Increase size of union sca_utility to four bytes
kvm_s390_update_topology_change_report() modifies a single bit within
sca_utility using cmpxchg(). Given that the size of the sca_utility union
is two bytes this generates very inefficient code. Change the size to four
bytes, so better code can be generated.
Even though the size of sca_utility doesn't reflect architecture anymore
this seems to be the easiest and most pragmatic approach to avoid
inefficient code.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 1cd8eaebd3c0..1cb1de232b9e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ union ipte_control {
};
union sca_utility {
- __u16 val;
+ __u32 val;
struct {
- __u16 mtcr : 1;
- __u16 reserved : 15;
+ __u32 mtcr : 1;
+ __u32 : 31;
};
};
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ struct bsca_block {
__u64 reserved[5];
__u64 mcn;
union sca_utility utility;
- __u8 reserved2[6];
+ __u8 reserved2[4];
struct bsca_entry cpu[KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS];
};
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct esca_block {
union ipte_control ipte_control;
__u64 reserved1[6];
union sca_utility utility;
- __u8 reserved2[6];
+ __u8 reserved2[4];
__u64 mcn[4];
__u64 reserved3[20];
struct esca_entry cpu[KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS];
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists