[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241125132029.7241-5-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:20:24 +0100
From: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
len.brown@...el.com,
artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de,
gautham.shenoy@....com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] x86/smp: Allow calling mwait_play_dead with arbitrary hint
The MWAIT instruction needs different hints on different CPUs to reach
the most specific idle states. The current hint calculation* in
mwait_play_dead() code works in practice on current hardware, but it
fails on a recent one, Intel's Sierra Forest and possibly some future ones.
Those newer CPUs' power efficiency suffers when the CPU is put offline.
* The current calculation is the for loop inspecting edx in
mwait_play_dead()
The current implementation for looking up the mwait hint for the deepest
cstate, in mwait_play_dead() code works by inspecting CPUID leaf 0x5 and
calculates the mwait hint based on the number of reported substates.
This approach depends on the hints associated with them to be continuous
in the range [0, NUM_SUBSTATES-1]. This continuity is not documented and
is not met on the recent Intel platforms.
For example, Intel's Sierra Forest report two cstates with two substates
each in cpuid leaf 5:
Name* target cstate target subcstate (mwait hint)
===========================================================
C1 0x00 0x00
C1E 0x00 0x01
-- 0x10 ----
C6S 0x20 0x22
C6P 0x20 0x23
-- 0x30 ----
/* No more (sub)states all the way down to the end. */
===========================================================
* Names of the cstates are not included in the CPUID leaf 0x5, they are
taken from the product specific documentation.
Notice that hints 0x20 and 0x21 are skipped entirely for the target
cstate 0x20 (C6), being a cause of the problem for the current cpuid
leaf 0x5 algorithm.
Allow cpuidle code to provide mwait play dead loop with known, mwait
hint for the deepest idle state on a given platform, skipping the cpuid
based calculation.
Signed-off-by: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 3 ++
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
index ca073f40698f..d12fab4a83c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ void wbinvd_on_cpu(int cpu);
int wbinvd_on_all_cpus(void);
void smp_kick_mwait_play_dead(void);
+void mwait_play_dead_with_hint(unsigned long hint);
void native_smp_send_reschedule(int cpu);
void native_send_call_func_ipi(const struct cpumask *mask);
@@ -164,6 +165,8 @@ static inline struct cpumask *cpu_llc_shared_mask(int cpu)
{
return (struct cpumask *)cpumask_of(0);
}
+
+static inline void mwait_play_dead_with_hint(unsigned long eax_hint) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NMI_SELFTEST
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index b5a8f0891135..d0464c7a0af5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1272,13 +1272,57 @@ void play_dead_common(void)
local_irq_disable();
}
+void __noreturn mwait_play_dead_with_hint(unsigned long eax_hint)
+{
+ struct mwait_cpu_dead *md = this_cpu_ptr(&mwait_cpu_dead);
+
+ /* Set up state for the kexec() hack below */
+ md->status = CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT;
+ md->control = CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT;
+
+ wbinvd();
+
+ while (1) {
+ /*
+ * The CLFLUSH is a workaround for erratum AAI65 for
+ * the Xeon 7400 series. It's not clear it is actually
+ * needed, but it should be harmless in either case.
+ * The WBINVD is insufficient due to the spurious-wakeup
+ * case where we return around the loop.
+ */
+ mb();
+ clflush(md);
+ mb();
+ __monitor(md, 0, 0);
+ mb();
+ __mwait(eax_hint, 0);
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(md->control) == CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT) {
+ /*
+ * Kexec is about to happen. Don't go back into mwait() as
+ * the kexec kernel might overwrite text and data including
+ * page tables and stack. So mwait() would resume when the
+ * monitor cache line is written to and then the CPU goes
+ * south due to overwritten text, page tables and stack.
+ *
+ * Note: This does _NOT_ protect against a stray MCE, NMI,
+ * SMI. They will resume execution at the instruction
+ * following the HLT instruction and run into the problem
+ * which this is trying to prevent.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(md->status, CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT);
+ while(1)
+ native_halt();
+ }
+ }
+}
+
/*
* We need to flush the caches before going to sleep, lest we have
* dirty data in our caches when we come back up.
*/
static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
{
- struct mwait_cpu_dead *md = this_cpu_ptr(&mwait_cpu_dead);
unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
unsigned int highest_cstate = 0;
unsigned int highest_subcstate = 0;
@@ -1316,45 +1360,7 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
(highest_subcstate - 1);
}
- /* Set up state for the kexec() hack below */
- md->status = CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT;
- md->control = CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT;
-
- wbinvd();
-
- while (1) {
- /*
- * The CLFLUSH is a workaround for erratum AAI65 for
- * the Xeon 7400 series. It's not clear it is actually
- * needed, but it should be harmless in either case.
- * The WBINVD is insufficient due to the spurious-wakeup
- * case where we return around the loop.
- */
- mb();
- clflush(md);
- mb();
- __monitor(md, 0, 0);
- mb();
- __mwait(eax, 0);
-
- if (READ_ONCE(md->control) == CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT) {
- /*
- * Kexec is about to happen. Don't go back into mwait() as
- * the kexec kernel might overwrite text and data including
- * page tables and stack. So mwait() would resume when the
- * monitor cache line is written to and then the CPU goes
- * south due to overwritten text, page tables and stack.
- *
- * Note: This does _NOT_ protect against a stray MCE, NMI,
- * SMI. They will resume execution at the instruction
- * following the HLT instruction and run into the problem
- * which this is trying to prevent.
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(md->status, CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT);
- while(1)
- native_halt();
- }
- }
+ mwait_play_dead_with_hint(eax);
}
/*
--
2.47.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists