[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqYSujKXPFkdWcqRpOKZ+dJHQDkYM33Mt5JxuA=Mfs+WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:55:19 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: "Renjiang Han (QUIC)" <quic_renjiang@...cinc.com>
Cc: "bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org" <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, "Taniya Das (QUIC)" <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
"Vikash Garodia (QUIC)" <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: videocc: Use HW_CTRL_TRIGGER flag for
video GDSC's
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 at 07:31, Renjiang Han (QUIC)
<quic_renjiang@...cinc.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, November 23, 2024 8:17 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > On 23/11/2024 00:05, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > This leaves sm7150, sm8150 and sm8450 untouched. Don't they also need
> > > to use HW_CTRL_TRIGGER?
>
> > I believe the correct list here is anything that is HFI_VERSION_4XX in
>
> > You can't apply the second patch in this series without ensuring the clock controllers for sdm845 and sm7180
>
> > grep HFI_VERSION_4XX drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
>
> > drivers/clk/qcom/videocc-sdm845.c
> > drivers/clk/qcom/videocc-sc7180.c
>
> > Hmm.. that's what this patch does, to be fair my other email was flippant.
>
> > This is fine in general, once we can get some Tested-by: for it.
>
> > That's my question - what platforms has this change been tested on ?
>
> > I can do sdm845 but, we'll need to find someone with 7180 to verify IMO.
>
> Thanks for your comment. We have run video case with these two patches on sc7180. The result is fine.
A single case, a thorough tests, a mixture of suspend&resume while
playing video cases?
Also, can I please reiterate my question: sm7150, sm8150 and sm8450 ?
Should they also be changed to use HW_CTRL_TRIGGER?
Next question, sdm660, msm8996, msm8998: do they support HW_CTRL_TRIGGER?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists