linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] objtool: Collect all annotations in objtool.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241125143618.GQ38972@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:36:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] objtool: Collect all annotations in objtool.h

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 02:40:05PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 02:19:43PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > > > BTW, is there a reason .discard.[un]reachable weren't converted over?
> > > 
> > > Completely forgot/missed them. Let me add a patch.
> > 
> > So this is turning into a bit of a trainwreck :/
> > 
> > That is, the below works, but I ended up having to include objtool.h
> > from compiler.h, which is really unfortunate.
> 
> Or rather, I suppose I can move unreachable() into objtool.h (or another
> header entirely) and go include it from all the various files that call
> it.
> 
> Only ~70 files.

OK, done that. Fed it to the robot, lets see what comes apart.