[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241125042212.1522315-4-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:52:12 +0530
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
To: mpe@...erman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: sshegde@...ux.ibm.com, npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, ankur.a.arora@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
vschneid@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: print right preemption model in die
Preemption models can change at runtime with dynamic preemption in
place. So need to use the right methods instead of relying on
CONFIG_PREEMPT to decide whether its full preemption or not.
While there, fix it to print preemption model correctly.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
index edf5cabe5dfd..2556fa8ec019 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
@@ -266,7 +266,11 @@ static int __die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long err)
printk("%s PAGE_SIZE=%luK%s%s%s%s%s%s %s\n",
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) ? "LE" : "BE",
PAGE_SIZE / 1024, get_mmu_str(),
- IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) ? " PREEMPT" : "",
+ preempt_model_none() ? "none" :
+ preempt_model_voluntary() ? "voluntary" :
+ preempt_model_full() ? "full" :
+ preempt_model_lazy() ? "lazy" :
+ "",
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ? " SMP" : "",
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ? (" NR_CPUS=" __stringify(NR_CPUS)) : "",
debug_pagealloc_enabled() ? " DEBUG_PAGEALLOC" : "",
--
2.39.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists