[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgAesttDd8qj6m9Ns-Xz6+44N4MsOnyROw5YzzhV74W7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:40:43 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] tracing: Remove conditional locking from __DO_TRACE()
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 at 14:32, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com> wrote:
>
> BTW shadowing of the goto-label is not a -Wshadow but a -Wfckoff level
> of complain; I have spend a few days to think of something better,
> including abusing of switch and more ugly things, -ENOIDEA
Yeah, I think you need to do that __UNIQUE_ID() thing for labels,
because while you can introduce local labels (see "__label__" use in
the wait macros and a few other places, where we do it) you need to
have a block scope to do that and the goto needs to be inside that
scope, of course.
Which I don't see how to do in this situation.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists