[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241126151711.v5.1.Id0a0e78ab0421b6bce51c4b0b87e6aebdfc69ec7@changeid>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:17:11 -0800
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
lukas@...ner.de,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5] PCI: Allow PCI bridges to go to D3Hot on all Devicetree based platforms
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Unlike ACPI based platforms, there are no known issues with D3Hot for
the PCI bridges in Device Tree based platforms. Past discussions (Link
[1]) determined the restrictions around D3 should be relaxed for all
Device Tree systems. So let's allow the PCI bridges to go to D3Hot
during runtime.
To match devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge() -> devm_of_pci_bridge_init(), we
look at the host bridge's parent when determining whether this is a
Device Tree based platform. Not all bridges have their own node, but the
parent (controller) should.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240227225442.GA249898@bhelgaas/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240828210705.GA37859@bhelgaas/ [2]
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
[Brian: look at host bridge's parent, not bridge node; rewrite
description]
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
---
Based on prior work by Manivannan Sadhasivam that was part of a bigger
series that stalled:
[PATCH v5 4/4] PCI: Allow PCI bridges to go to D3Hot on all Devicetree based platforms
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240802-pci-bridge-d3-v5-4-2426dd9e8e27@linaro.org/
I'm resubmitting this single patch, since it's useful and seemingly had
agreement. I massaged it a bit to relax some restrictions on how the
Device Tree should look.
Changes in v5:
- Pulled out of the larger series, as there were more controversial
changes in there, while this one had agreement (Link [2]).
- Rewritten with a relaxed set of rules, because the above patch
required us to modify many device trees to add bridge nodes.
drivers/pci/pci.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index e278861684bc..5d898f5ea155 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -3018,6 +3018,8 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id bridge_d3_blacklist[] = {
*/
bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *bridge)
{
+ struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
+
if (!pci_is_pcie(bridge))
return false;
@@ -3038,6 +3040,15 @@ bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *bridge)
if (pci_bridge_d3_force)
return true;
+ /*
+ * Allow D3 for all Device Tree based systems. We assume a host
+ * bridge's parent will have a device node, even if this bridge
+ * may not have its own.
+ */
+ host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(bridge->bus);
+ if (dev_of_node(host_bridge->dev.parent))
+ return true;
+
/* Even the oldest 2010 Thunderbolt controller supports D3. */
if (bridge->is_thunderbolt)
return true;
--
2.47.0.338
Powered by blists - more mailing lists