[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241126091934.GP39245@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:19:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
scott.d.constable@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Rust KCFI support
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 01:35:16PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> The control flow integrity (kCFI) sanitizer is an important sanitizer
> that is often used in production. This patch series makes it possible to
> use kCFI and Rust together.
So about this -- there's a proposal for a modification to kCFI here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117121
And Sami notes that this would break this Rust thing. Assuming all the
relevant crabs are present on this thread, could you please comment?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists