[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <980c5cee-2dc3-4d26-b749-6ba00b9c2091@broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:13:44 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: Alex Shumsky <alexthreed@...il.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexey Berezhok <a@...repo.ru>, Alvin Šipraga
<ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>, Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix RSSI report in AP mode
On 11/22/2024 10:03 PM, Alex Shumsky wrote:
> After commit 9a1590934d9a ("brcmfmac: correctly report average RSSI in
> station info") it is required from firmware to provide rx_lastpkt_rssi.
> If this field is not provided brcmfmac doesn't report any RSSI at all.
> Unfortunately some firmwares doesn't provide it. One example is firmware
> for BCM43455 found in Raspbberry Pi.
> See https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/4574
>
> Fix it by falling back to rssi field if rx_lastpkt_rssi is not provided
> (like it was before 9a1590934d9a).
Sounds like a reasonable approach. However, I would like to learn more
about the issue. Maybe it is a per-vendor issue so I am interested what
the sta_info version is that we get from firmware. It is printed in
brcmf_cfg80211_get_station() with brcmf_dbg(). You can make it a
bphy_err() call instead or enable TRACE level debug messages in the driver.
Also would be good to know the firmware version and kernel version of
the BCM43455.
Regards,
Arend
Powered by blists - more mailing lists