[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241126132152.3dc746e7@p-imbrenda>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:21:52 +0100
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: s390: Increase size of union sca_utility to
four bytes
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:09:56 +0100
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 11/26/24 11:25 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> [...]
> > union sca_utility {
>
> Would you mind adding a comment?
>
>
> ""Utility is defined as 2 bytes but having it 4 bytes wide generates
> more efficient code. Since the following bytes are reserved this makes
> no functional difference.""
looks good, thanks!
>
> > - __u16 val;
> > + __u32 val;
> > struct {
> > - __u16 mtcr : 1;
> > - __u16 reserved : 15;
> > + __u32 mtcr : 1;
> > + __u32 : 31;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ struct bsca_block {
> > __u64 reserved[5];
> > __u64 mcn;
> > union sca_utility utility;
> > - __u8 reserved2[6];
> > + __u8 reserved2[4];
> > struct bsca_entry cpu[KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS];
> > };
> >
> > @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct esca_block {
> > union ipte_control ipte_control;
> > __u64 reserved1[6];
> > union sca_utility utility;
> > - __u8 reserved2[6];
> > + __u8 reserved2[4];
> > __u64 mcn[4];
> > __u64 reserved3[20];
> > struct esca_entry cpu[KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS];
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists