linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add S32G2/S32G3 SoC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e8d11c7f-0bf5-44cd-bb2d-a7e454905e53@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:21:14 +0200
From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 NXP S32 Linux <s32@....com>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
 Christophe Lizzi <clizzi@...hat.com>, Alberto Ruiz <aruizrui@...hat.com>,
 Enric Balletbo <eballetb@...hat.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add S32G2/S32G3 SoC
 support

On 11/26/2024 5:19 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 26.11.2024 16:18:41, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 26.11.2024 17:15:10, Ciprian Marian Costea wrote:
>>>>>>>> +        interrupt-names:
>>>>>>>> +          items:
>>>>>>>> +            - const: mb_0-7
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if it makes sense to have an interrupt name not
>>>> mentioning the exact mailbox numbers, so that the same interrupt name
>>>> can be used for a different IP core, too. On the coldfire SoC the 1st
>>>> IRQ handles mailboxes 0...15.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am ok with proposing a more generic name for mailboxes in order to
>>> increase reusability among FlexCAN enabled SoCs.
>>> Further specific mailbox numbers could be mentioned in the actual
>>> S32G2/S32G3 dtsi flexcan node.
>>>
>>> One proposal could be:
>>> - mb-1: First Range of Mailboxes
>>> - mb-2: Second Range of Mailboxes
>>>
>>> Let me know if you agree to update as proposed in V3.
>>
>> Looks good to me!
> 
> Or maybe start with "0", that makes it a bit easier to construct the
> names of the IRQ-names in a for loop.
> 
> regards,
> Marc
> 

That makes sense. Thanks for the suggestion.

Best Regards,
Ciprian