linux-kernel - Re: Russians in the Kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <178683687.1369157.1732589356785@fidget.co-bxl>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:49:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Dylan ‎ ‎ <falaichte@...lfence.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Russians in the Kernel

Thought I'd check back in as the thread bares repeating after the recent incident with Kent Overstreet. The Code of Conduct is not being fairly applied across the entirety of the Linux kernel development space and I feel that the direct violation of the Code of Conduct by the Linux Foundation and Greg Kroah-Hartman by discriminating against a group of people for their nationality and ethnicity should be addressed at the earliest convenience.

On Nov 5, 2024 at 4:34 PM, "Dylan ‎ ‎" <falaichte@...lfence.com> wrote:> For another,
any proxy set up to bypass the sanctions that really exist (i.e.
based on employment by sanctioned companies) would fall under the
same sanctions.

You could make the argument that sanctions as per the laws of the United States
is itself unconstitutional as it impedes people's right to freedom of assembly.
Even then, there is still the point that the Linux kernel and similar open
source projects are transnational communities and by prohibiting access to
participation you aren't respecting the spirit of free and open source
software. Where anyone may participate regardless of their walk of life. I can
understand not wanting to incur the wrath of the American government and that
it is better to comply in some cases than make a stand as has been the case
with Nintendo and emulation. I just simply don't like the amount of
governmental overreach with that particular executive order and believe that it
should be undermined wherever legally possible. 

Though I'll understand if the idea does end up getting anywhere. I just thought
that it was worth sharing nonetheless.

> For another, you really don't want to set anything with even
the slightest whiff of "that's how to hide patch origin and/or
evade review" - that's an open invitation to any organization
that wants to feed something underhanded into the kernel.
Won't be a healthy place to hang around, to put it very mildly.

The difference is that it would all be above board with the intermediary acting
as a buffer between those targeted by sanctions and the work they've done. It's
all open source anyway, so there's nothing that can be done if their source
code was forked and then used upstream in a patch series.

-- 
Sent with https://mailfence.com  
Secure and private email

-- 
Sent with https://mailfence.com  
Secure and private email