linux-kernel - Re: bcachefs: suspicious mm pointer in struct dio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97465113-ea1a-4cee-9235-d6900158aa74@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:59:17 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, io-uring <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bcachefs: suspicious mm pointer in struct dio_write

On 11/27/24 2:58 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>>> By the way, did the lifetime issue that was causing umount/remount to
>>> fail ever get resolved? I've currently got no test coverage for
>>> io_uring, would be nice to flip that back on.
>>
>> Nope, I do have an updated branch since then, but it's still sitting
>> waiting on getting a bit more love. I suspect it'll be done for 6.14.
> 
> Alright - if you want to ping me when that's ready, along with any other
> knobs I should flip on for io_uring support, I'll flip io_uring back on
> in my test infrastructure at that time.

Will do, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe