[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3de91bd8-ba8f-2779-71e5-81295bd941e4@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:37:15 +0530
From: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Renjiang Han
<quic_renjiang@...cinc.com>
CC: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
"bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org" <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
"Mauro Carvalho
Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof
Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn
Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_qiweil@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] media: venus: core: add qcs615 platform data
On 11/26/2024 5:33 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 03:40:47PM +0800, Renjiang Han wrote:
>>
>> On 11/26/2024 12:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 03:34:19PM +0000, Renjiang Han (QUIC) wrote:
>>>> On Monday, November 25, 2024 9:36 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 11:04:50AM +0530, Renjiang Han wrote:
>>>>>> Initialize the platform data and enable venus driver probe of QCS615
>>>>>> SoC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Renjiang Han <quic_renjiang@...cinc.com> >
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c | 50
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
>>>>>> index
>>>>>> 423deb5e94dcb193974da23f9bd2d905bfeab2d9..39d8bcf62fe4f72674746b75994c
>>>>>> ce6cbaee94eb 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
>>>>>> @@ -630,6 +630,55 @@ static const struct venus_resources msm8998_res = {
>>>>>> .fwname = "qcom/venus-4.4/venus.mbn", };
>>>>>> +static const struct freq_tbl qcs615_freq_table[] = {
>>>>>> + { 0, 460000000 },
>>>>>> + { 0, 410000000 },
>>>>>> + { 0, 380000000 },
>>>>>> + { 0, 300000000 },
>>>>>> + { 0, 240000000 },
>>>>>> + { 0, 133333333 },
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static const struct bw_tbl qcs615_bw_table_enc[] = {
>>>>>> + { 972000, 951000, 0, 1434000, 0 }, /* 3840x2160@30 */
>>>>>> + { 489600, 723000, 0, 973000, 0 }, /* 1920x1080@60 */
>>>>>> + { 244800, 370000, 0, 495000, 0 }, /* 1920x1080@30 */
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static const struct bw_tbl qcs615_bw_table_dec[] = {
>>>>>> + { 1036800, 1987000, 0, 2797000, 0 }, /* 4096x2160@30 */
>>>>>> + { 489600, 1040000, 0, 1298000, 0 }, /* 1920x1080@60 */
>>>>>> + { 244800, 530000, 0, 659000, 0 }, /* 1920x1080@30 */
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static const struct venus_resources qcs615_res = {
>>>>>> + .freq_tbl = qcs615_freq_table,
>>>>>> + .freq_tbl_size = ARRAY_SIZE(qcs615_freq_table),
>>>>>> + .bw_tbl_enc = qcs615_bw_table_enc,
>>>>>> + .bw_tbl_enc_size = ARRAY_SIZE(qcs615_bw_table_enc),
>>>>>> + .bw_tbl_dec = qcs615_bw_table_dec,
>>>>>> + .bw_tbl_dec_size = ARRAY_SIZE(qcs615_bw_table_dec),
>>>>>> + .clks = {"core", "iface", "bus" },
>>>>>> + .clks_num = 3,
>>>>>> + .vcodec0_clks = { "vcodec0_core", "vcodec0_bus" },
>>>>>> + .vcodec_clks_num = 2,
>>>>>> + .vcodec_pmdomains = (const char *[]) { "venus", "vcodec0" },
>>>>>> + .vcodec_pmdomains_num = 2,
>>>>>> + .opp_pmdomain = (const char *[]) { "cx" },
>>>>>> + .vcodec_num = 1,
>>>>>> + .hfi_version = HFI_VERSION_4XX,
>>>>>> + .vpu_version = VPU_VERSION_AR50,
>>>>>> + .vmem_id = VIDC_RESOURCE_NONE,
>>>>>> + .vmem_size = 0,
>>>>>> + .vmem_addr = 0,
>>>>>> + .dma_mask = 0xe0000000 - 1,
>>>>>> + .cp_start = 0,
>>>>>> + .cp_size = 0x70800000,
>>>>>> + .cp_nonpixel_start = 0x1000000,
>>>>>> + .cp_nonpixel_size = 0x24800000,
>>>>>> + .fwname = "qcom/venus-5.4/venus_s6.mbn",
>>>>> I really want the firmware discussion of linux-firmware to be solved first,
>>>>> before we land this patch.
>>>>> SHort summary: can we use a single image for all 5.4 platforms (by using
>>>>> v5 signatures, by using v6 signatures, v3 or any other kind of quirk).
>>>> Thanks for your comment. We have discussed with the firmware team and
>>>> other teams if we can use the same firmware binary. The result is we'd better
>>>> use different firmware files. They should respond in the firmware binary
>>>> thread. I will push them and hope them respond as quickly as possible and
>>>> give reasons.
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> static const struct freq_tbl sdm660_freq_table[] = {
>>>>>> { 979200, 518400000 },
>>>>>> { 489600, 441600000 },
>>>>>> @@ -937,6 +986,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id venus_dt_match[] = {
>>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-venus", .data = &msm8916_res, },
>>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-venus", .data = &msm8996_res, },
>>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-venus", .data = &msm8998_res, },
>>>>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,qcs615-venus", .data = &qcs615_res, },
>>>>> The hardware seems to be the same as sc7180, only the frequencies differ.
>>>>> Can we change the driver in a way that we don't have to add another
>>>>> compat entry just for the sake of changing freqs / bandwidths?
>>>> Thank you for your comment. I agree with you. But based on the Venus code
>>>> architecturE ANd the distinction between different platforms, I think the
>>>> current changes are the simplest.
>>> Well, it is simplest, correct. But not the best one. There is no plan no
>>> migrate these platforms to the iris driver. So instead, please improve
>>> the venus driver instead of just pushing the simplest change. I should
>>> have been more explicit about it earlier.
>>
>> Based on the current code architecture, I don't know if there is a better
>> way. If we
>>
>> refactor the code, it will take a lot of effort.
>
> Yes, please. The freq_tbl contents is a duplicate of the OPP table in
> DT. Drop it from the driver.
Agree, we should reuse OPP table in this case to set the required rate.
Renjiang, let us know your findings with using opp table.
Regards,
Vikash
>> Therefore, I submit this change. Do you have a better approach?
>
> NAK for this submission. Please spend some time and improve the driver
> instead.
>
>>
>> Also, the driver architecture of iris is implemented as you said.
>
> Irrelevant. You are patching venus, not iris.
>
>>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm660-venus", .data = &sdm660_res, },
>>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-venus", .data = &sdm845_res, },
>>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-venus-v2", .data = &sdm845_res_v2, },
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With best wishes
>>>>> Dmitry
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Renjiang
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists