[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8982d065-9bc6-4036-8004-80b1681eaf3c@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:54:10 +0800
From: Yongxing Mou <quic_yongmou@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Ritesh Kumar
<quic_riteshk@...cinc.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof
Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Neil
Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
CC: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Display enablement changes for Qualcomm QCS8300
platform
On 2024/11/27 15:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/11/2024 08:05, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>> This series introduces support to enable the Mobile Display Subsystem (MDSS)
>> and Display Processing Unit (DPU) for the Qualcomm QCS8300 target. It
>> includes the addition of the hardware catalog, compatible string,
>> relevant device tree changes, and their YAML bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yongxing Mou <quic_yongmou@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> This series depends on following series:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241114-qcs8300-mm-cc-dt-patch-v1-1-7a974508c736@quicinc.com/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925-qcs8300_initial_dtsi-v2-0-494c40fa2a42@quicinc.com/
> Above was not part of this merge window, so nothing from your patchset
> can be merged for this v6.14.
>
> If you want things to get merged, I suggest decoupling dependencies.
>
Thanks for reviewing.Can we keep the dependency on above changes and
merge our changes after the dependent changes are merged?
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists