lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0aGVA4xtIa2G8Ei@cse-cd02-lnx.ap.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:39:16 +0800
From: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_zhgao@...cinc.com>, <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci-msm: Correctly set the load for the
 regulator

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:43:12PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 22/11/24 09:50, Yuanjie Yang wrote:
> > Qualcomm regulator supports two power supply modes: HPM and LPM.
> > Currently, the sdhci-msm.c driver does not set the load to adjust
> > the current for eMMC and SD. Therefore, if the regulator set load
> > in LPM state, it will lead to the inability to properly initialize
> > eMMC and SD.
> > 
> > Set the correct regulator current for eMMC and SD to ensure that the
> > device can work normally even when the regulator is in LPM.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > index e00208535bd1..f2a2260d54c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > @@ -134,9 +134,22 @@
> >  /* Timeout value to avoid infinite waiting for pwr_irq */
> >  #define MSM_PWR_IRQ_TIMEOUT_MS 5000
> >  
> > +/* Max load for eMMC Vdd supply */
> > +#define MMC_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA	570000
> > +
> >  /* Max load for eMMC Vdd-io supply */
> >  #define MMC_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA	325000
> >  
> > +/* Max load for SD Vdd supply */
> > +#define SD_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA	800000
> > +
> > +/* Max load for SD Vdd-io supply */
> > +#define SD_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA	22000
> > +
> > +#define MAX_MMC_SD_VMMC_LOAD_UA  max(MMC_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA, SD_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA)
> > +
> > +#define MAX_MMC_SD_VQMMC_LOAD_UA max(MMC_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA, SD_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA)
> > +
> >  #define msm_host_readl(msm_host, host, offset) \
> >  	msm_host->var_ops->msm_readl_relaxed(host, offset)
> >  
> > @@ -147,6 +160,11 @@
> >  #define CQHCI_VENDOR_CFG1	0xA00
> >  #define CQHCI_VENDOR_DIS_RST_ON_CQ_EN	(0x3 << 13)
> >  
> > +enum {
> 
> This could be a named type and used instead of 'int'
> e.g.
> 
> enum msm_reg_type {
Thanks , I will fix it in next version.

> > +	VMMC_REGULATOR,
> > +	VQMMC_REGULATOR,
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct sdhci_msm_offset {
> >  	u32 core_hc_mode;
> >  	u32 core_mci_data_cnt;
> > @@ -1403,11 +1421,70 @@ static int sdhci_msm_set_pincfg(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host, bool level)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > +static int sdhci_msm_get_regulator_load(struct mmc_host *mmc, int max_current, int type)
> 
> Then 'int type' could be 'enum msm_reg_type type'
Thanks, I will fix it in next version.

> > +{
> > +	int load = 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * When eMMC and SD are powered on for the first time, select a higher
> > +	 * current value from the corresponding current for eMMC and SD to
> > +	 * ensure that the eMMC and SD cards start up properly and complete
> > +	 * initialization. After the initialization process is finished, use
> > +	 * the corresponding current to set the eMMC and SD to ensure the
> > +	 * normal work of the device.
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	if (!mmc->card)
> > +		return max_current;
> > +
> > +	if (mmc_card_is_removable(mmc) && mmc_card_mmc(mmc->card))
> 
> The comment mentions eMMC but here there is 'mmc_card_is_removable()'
> whereas eMMC's are not removable.  If this is right it needs some
> clarification.
Thanks, I also realize that mmc_card_is_removable(mmc) is an unnecessary
judgment. I will delete this judgment in next version.

> > +		load = (type == VMMC_REGULATOR) ? MMC_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA : MMC_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA;
> > +	else if (mmc_card_sd(mmc->card))
> > +		load = (type == VMMC_REGULATOR) ? SD_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA : SD_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA;
> > +
> > +	return load;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int msm_config_regulator_load(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host, struct mmc_host *mmc,
> > +				     bool hpm, int max_current, int type)
> 
> Again 'int type' could be 'enum msm_reg_type type'
Thanks, I will fix it in next version.

> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	int load = 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * After the initialization process is finished, Once the type of card
> > +	 * is determined,only set the corresponding current for SD and eMMC.
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	if (mmc->card && !(mmc_card_mmc(mmc->card) || mmc_card_sd(mmc->card)))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (hpm)
> > +		load = sdhci_msm_get_regulator_load(mmc, max_current, type);
> > +
> > +	if (type == VMMC_REGULATOR)
> > +		ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, load);
> > +	else
> > +		ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, load);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		dev_err(mmc_dev(mmc), "%s: set load failed: %d\n",
> > +			mmc_hostname(mmc), ret);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
> > +			      struct mmc_host *mmc, bool hpm)
> >  {
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> >  	if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc))
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	ret = msm_config_regulator_load(msm_host, mmc, hpm,
> > +					MAX_MMC_SD_VMMC_LOAD_UA, VMMC_REGULATOR);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> >  	return mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, mmc->ios.vdd);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1435,6 +1512,15 @@ static int msm_toggle_vqmmc(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
> >  				goto out;
> >  			}
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		ret = msm_config_regulator_load(msm_host, mmc, level,
> > +						MAX_MMC_SD_VQMMC_LOAD_UA, VQMMC_REGULATOR);
> > +		if (ret < 0) {
> > +			dev_err(mmc_dev(mmc), "%s: vqmmc set regulator load failed: %d\n",
> > +				mmc_hostname(mmc), ret);
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vqmmc);
> >  	} else {
> >  		ret = regulator_disable(mmc->supply.vqmmc);
> > @@ -1642,7 +1728,8 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (pwr_state) {
> > -		ret = sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(mmc);
> > +		ret = sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(msm_host, mmc,
> > +					 pwr_state & REQ_BUS_ON);
> >  		if (!ret)
> >  			ret = sdhci_msm_set_vqmmc(msm_host, mmc,
> >  					pwr_state & REQ_BUS_ON);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ