[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7846b08f-5bdb-448b-9c56-73d9f16a839b@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:58:53 +0200
From: "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<bhe@...hat.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jonnyc@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kexec: Check if IRQ is already masked before
masking
> Maybe a slightly better approach would be to simplify this code for
> something that actually uses the kernel infrastructure:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index 82e2203d86a31..9b48d952df3ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -230,11 +230,8 @@ static void machine_kexec_mask_interrupts(void)
> chip->irq_eoi)
> chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
>
> - if (chip->irq_mask)
> - chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data);
> -
> - if (chip->irq_disable && !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data))
> - chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data);
> + irq_set_status_flags(i, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
> + irq_disable(desc);
> }
> }
>
> This is of course untested.
I tested your suggested approach and it works.
I will upload V2 for this change.
Thanks, Eliav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists