linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: Don't wait for completion of in-flight requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0c4vPLnwicI6T9J@fedora>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 23:20:28 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Qiang Ma <maqianga@...ontech.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
	axboe@...nel.dk, dwagner@...e.de, hare@...e.de,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Don't wait for completion of in-flight requests

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 10:04:37PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:15:02 +0800
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 07:50:08PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> > > Problem:
> > > When the system disk uses the scsi disk bus, The main
> > > qemu command line includes:
> > > ...
> > > -device virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi0 \
> > > -device scsi-hd,scsi-id=1,drive=drive-virtio-disk
> > > -drive id=drive-virtio-disk,if=none,file=/home/kvm/test.qcow2
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > The dmesg log is as follows::
> > > 
> > > [   50.304591][ T4382] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> > > [   50.377002][ T4382] kexec_core: Starting new kernel

Why is one new kernel started? what event triggers kernel_kexec()?

machine_shutdown() follows, probably the scsi controller is dead.

> > > [   50.669775][  T194] psci: CPU1 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   50.849665][  T194] psci: CPU2 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   51.109625][  T194] psci: CPU3 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   51.319594][  T194] psci: CPU4 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   51.489667][  T194] psci: CPU5 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   51.709582][  T194] psci: CPU6 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   51.949508][   T10] psci: CPU7 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   52.139499][   T10] psci: CPU8 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   52.289426][   T10] psci: CPU9 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   52.439552][   T10] psci: CPU10 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   52.579525][   T10] psci: CPU11 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   52.709501][   T10] psci: CPU12 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   52.819509][  T194] psci: CPU13 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [   52.919509][  T194] psci: CPU14 killed (polled 0 ms)
> > > [  243.214009][  T115] INFO: task kworker/0:1:10 blocked for more
> > > than 122 seconds. [  243.214810][  T115]       Not tainted 6.6.0+ #1
> > > [  243.215517][  T115] "echo 0
> > > > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > > > [  243.216390][  T115] task:kworker/0:1     state:D stack:0
> > > > pid:10    ppid:2      flags:0x00000008
> > > [  243.217299][  T115] Workqueue: events vmstat_shepherd
> > > [  243.217816][  T115] Call trace:
> > > [  243.218133][  T115]  __switch_to+0x130/0x1e8
> > > [  243.218568][  T115]  __schedule+0x660/0xcf8
> > > [  243.219013][  T115]  schedule+0x58/0xf0
> > > [  243.219402][  T115]  percpu_rwsem_wait+0xb0/0x1d0
> > > [  243.219880][  T115]  __percpu_down_read+0x40/0xe0
> > > [  243.220353][  T115]  cpus_read_lock+0x5c/0x70
> > > [  243.220795][  T115]  vmstat_shepherd+0x40/0x140
> > > [  243.221250][  T115]  process_one_work+0x170/0x3c0
> > > [  243.221726][  T115]  worker_thread+0x234/0x3b8
> > > [  243.222176][  T115]  kthread+0xf0/0x108
> > > [  243.222564][  T115]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > > ...
> > > [  243.254080][  T115] INFO: task kworker/0:2:194 blocked for more
> > > than 122 seconds. [  243.254834][  T115]       Not tainted 6.6.0+ #1
> > > [  243.255529][  T115] "echo 0
> > > > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > > > [  243.256378][  T115] task:kworker/0:2     state:D stack:0
> > > > pid:194   ppid:2      flags:0x00000008
> > > [  243.257284][  T115] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
> > > [  243.257793][  T115] Call trace:
> > > [  243.258111][  T115]  __switch_to+0x130/0x1e8
> > > [  243.258541][  T115]  __schedule+0x660/0xcf8
> > > [  243.258971][  T115]  schedule+0x58/0xf0
> > > [  243.259360][  T115]  schedule_timeout+0x280/0x2f0
> > > [  243.259832][  T115]  wait_for_common+0xcc/0x2d8
> > > [  243.260287][  T115]  wait_for_completion+0x20/0x38
> > > [  243.260767][  T115]  cpuhp_kick_ap+0xe8/0x278
> > > [  243.261207][  T115]  cpuhp_kick_ap_work+0x5c/0x188
> > > [  243.261688][  T115]  _cpu_down+0x120/0x378
> > > [  243.262103][  T115]  __cpu_down_maps_locked+0x20/0x38
> > > [  243.262609][  T115]  work_for_cpu_fn+0x24/0x40
> > > [  243.263059][  T115]  process_one_work+0x170/0x3c0
> > > [  243.263533][  T115]  worker_thread+0x234/0x3b8
> > > [  243.263981][  T115]  kthread+0xf0/0x108
> > > [  243.264405][  T115]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > > [  243.264846][  T115] INFO: task kworker/15:2:639 blocked for more
> > > than 122 seconds. [  243.265602][  T115]       Not tainted 6.6.0+ #1
> > > [  243.266296][  T115] "echo 0
> > > > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > > > [  243.267143][  T115] task:kworker/15:2    state:D stack:0
> > > > pid:639   ppid:2      flags:0x00000008
> > > [  243.268044][  T115] Workqueue: events_freezable_power_
> > > disk_events_workfn [  243.268727][  T115] Call trace:
> > > [  243.269051][  T115]  __switch_to+0x130/0x1e8
> > > [  243.269481][  T115]  __schedule+0x660/0xcf8
> > > [  243.269903][  T115]  schedule+0x58/0xf0
> > > [  243.270293][  T115]  schedule_timeout+0x280/0x2f0
> > > [  243.270763][  T115]  io_schedule_timeout+0x50/0x70
> > > [  243.271245][  T115]  wait_for_common_io.constprop.0+0xb0/0x298
> > > [  243.271830][  T115]  wait_for_completion_io+0x1c/0x30
> > > [  243.272335][  T115]  blk_execute_rq+0x1d8/0x278
> > > [  243.272793][  T115]  scsi_execute_cmd+0x114/0x238
> > > [  243.273267][  T115]  sr_check_events+0xc8/0x310 [sr_mod]
> > > [  243.273808][  T115]  cdrom_check_events+0x2c/0x50 [cdrom]
> > > [  243.274408][  T115]  sr_block_check_events+0x34/0x48 [sr_mod]
> > > [  243.274994][  T115]  disk_check_events+0x44/0x1b0
> > > [  243.275468][  T115]  disk_events_workfn+0x20/0x38
> > > [  243.275939][  T115]  process_one_work+0x170/0x3c0
> > > [  243.276410][  T115]  worker_thread+0x234/0x3b8
> > > [  243.276855][  T115]  kthread+0xf0/0x108
> > > [  243.277241][  T115]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20  
> > 
> > Question is why this scsi command can't be completed?
> > 
> > When blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline() is called, the CPU isn't shutdown
> > yet, and it still can handle interrupt of this SCSI command.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ming
> > 
> > 
> Sorry, at the moment I don't know why it can't be finished,
> just provides a solution like loop and dm-rq.
> 
> Currently see the call stack:
>  => blk_mq_run_hw_queue
>  =>__blk_mq_sched_restart
>  => blk_mq_run_hw_queue
>  => __blk_mq_sched_restart
>  => __blk_mq_free_request
>  => blk_mq_free_request
>  => blk_mq_end_request
>  => blk_flush_complete_seq
>  => flush_end_io
>  => __blk_mq_end_request
>  => scsi_end_request
>  => scsi_io_completion
>  => scsi_finish_command
>  => scsi_complete
>  => blk_mq_complete_request
>  => scsi_done_internal
>  => scsi_done
>  => virtscsi_complete_cmd
>  => virtscsi_req_done
>  => vring_interrupt
> 
> In finction blk_mq_run_hw_queue():
> __blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(hctx->queue, false,
> 	need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
> 	blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx));
> 	
> 	if (!need_run)
> 		return;
> 
> Come here and return directly.

Does blk_queue_quiesced() return true?

Thanks,
Ming