[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59ec100f-1915-447b-98fb-3cbe2ca53a1f@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:09:21 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Vishwaroop A <va@...dia.com>, krzk+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: spi: Add DT schema for Tegra SPIDEV
controller
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 03:54:52PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On the Tegra Jetson boards we have a 40-pin expansion header similar to what
> is found on boards like Raspberry Pi and allows users to connect various
> cards to. By having a pseudo device we can interact with different SPI
> devices.
> Yes by default nothing is connected and so there is nothing to talk to.
> However, this does enable us to do SPI loopback testing for example.
> So I am wondering if it would be acceptable to having some generic dummy
> device-tree compatible string for this? I guess it does not need to be Tegra
> specific.
I understand what he's trying to accomplish, it's the same thing as
what everyone who wants to put a raw spidev compatible in their DT is
trying to do. The way to do this would be something like a DT overlay
that describes whatever is actually connected, or just customise the DT
locally.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists