[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241127032821.57468-1-hbczqbc@163.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:28:21 +0800
From: zgBCQ <zghbqbc@...il.com>
To: markus.elfring@....de
Cc: ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
jjohnson@...nel.org,
kvalo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
zghbqbc@...il.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Fix NULL pointer check in ath11k_ce_rx_post_pipe()
thanks for your reply
> Is there a need to reconsider also such a return value?
According to the current code (commit d5c65159f289) of
this function, this function should be terminated directly
after checking the null pointer, the return value may be
meaningless.
Baichuan Qi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists