[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0dkpqogjSCnJQec@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:27:50 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf-tools changes for v6.13
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:02:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 at 19:25, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think it's a bug in perf record since v6.12. I found the build-id
> > event in the header area is broken. Can you verify if this works?
>
> Ahh. And the reason I thought it was new to this release was simply
> because I was traveling during the 6.12 merge window and didn't do the
> tools build that I usually do, so I hadn't realized it was actually
> pre-existing.
>
> Your patch indeed seems to fix it for me. Not hugely urgent (I just
> installed the fixed perf binaries and clearly nobody else has even hit
> the issue), so I'll leave this alone until the next perf tools fixes
> pull and we'll get it fixed then.
Good to hear it worked. I'll add it to the perf-tools tree.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists