[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0j3Nfm_EXiGPObq@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 23:05:25 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] list_lru: expand list_lru_add() docs with info about
sublists
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:12:11PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> - * Return: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
> + * Return value: true if the item was added, false otherwise
This is an incorrect change. The section is always called 'Return', not
'Return value'; see Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst. And I
think it was fine to say "list was updated" rather than "item was
added". They're basically synonyms.
> - * Return value: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
> + * Return value: true if the item was added, false otherwise
Ditto (and other similar changes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists