[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <980b98978ab4ee912b37cb101ad43bce20b56dcb.camel@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:01:52 +0800
From: laokz <zhangkai@...as.ac.cn>
To: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>, Paul Walmsley
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>, Andrew Jones
<ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: module: use a plain variable for list_head
instead of a pointer
On Wed, 2024-11-27 at 15:25 +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> rel_head's list_head member, rel_entry, doesn't need to be allocated,
> its storage can just be part of the allocated rel_head. Remove the
Oh my poor English. OK, it's more better than just add the lost kfree.
> pointer which allows to get rid of the allocation as well as an
> existing
> memory leak found by Kai Zang using kmemleak.
^
Zhang
BTW. Doesn't it need a fixes tag like what you suggested? (The bug
might come from 6.7)
>
> Reported-by: Kai Zhang <zhangkai@...as.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> ---
>
> V2:
> - Add Kai Reported-by
> - Reword the commit description (Andrew)
>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 18 ++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> index 1cd461f3d872..47d0ebeec93c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct used_bucket {
>
> struct relocation_head {
> struct hlist_node node;
> - struct list_head *rel_entry;
> + struct list_head rel_entry;
> void *location;
> };
>
> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ process_accumulated_relocations(struct module
> *me,
> location = rel_head_iter->location;
> list_for_each_entry_safe(rel_entry_iter,
> rel_entry_iter_tmp,
> - rel_head_iter-
> >rel_entry,
> + &rel_head_iter-
> >rel_entry,
> head) {
> curr_type = rel_entry_iter->type;
> reloc_handlers[curr_type].reloc_handl
> er(
> @@ -704,16 +704,7 @@ static int add_relocation_to_accumulate(struct
> module *me, int type,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - rel_head->rel_entry =
> - kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> - if (!rel_head->rel_entry) {
> - kfree(entry);
> - kfree(rel_head);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> -
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(rel_head->rel_entry);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rel_head->rel_entry);
> rel_head->location = location;
> INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rel_head->node);
> if (!current_head->first) {
> @@ -722,7 +713,6 @@ static int add_relocation_to_accumulate(struct
> module *me, int type,
>
> if (!bucket) {
> kfree(entry);
> - kfree(rel_head->rel_entry);
> kfree(rel_head);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -735,7 +725,7 @@ static int add_relocation_to_accumulate(struct
> module *me, int type,
> }
>
> /* Add relocation to head of discovered rel_head */
> - list_add_tail(&entry->head, rel_head->rel_entry);
> + list_add_tail(&entry->head, &rel_head->rel_entry);
>
> return 0;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists