[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYshK6+AuXSnu7c=j+QJ38kN6O6t7B=DdzqQrMN_rGsJhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 15:58:06 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, konradybcio@...nel.org, quic_okukatla@...cinc.com,
quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com, quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: pc : qnoc_probe (drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c:269) :
Dragonboard 410c - arm64 - boot failed
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 at 21:12, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 08:43:44PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > [Small correction]
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 at 20:33, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > The arm64 Dragonboard 410c has failed with the Linux next, mainline
> > > and the Linux stable. Please find boot log and build links.
> >
> > This boot regression is noticed only on Dragonboard 845c.
> > Linux next-20241125 tag.
> >
> > Good: next-20241122
> > Bad: next-20241125
>
> Can you bisect to see what change introduced this?
The bisection did not provide any good results.
I have been tracking these boot failures on db410c and then the boot
test got passed on next-20241126, next-20241127 and next-20241128.
Boot test history:
-----------------
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20241125/testrun/26040307/suite/boot/test/korg-clang-19-lkftconfig-hardening/history/
- Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists