[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7662be43-16e6-4695-9bc4-077e1dd3ba12@ghiti.fr>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 14:02:40 +0100
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, Björn Töpel
<bjorn@...osinc.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: kprobes: Fix incorrect address calculation
Hi Nam,
On 19/11/2024 12:10, Nam Cao wrote:
> p->ainsn.api.insn is a pointer to u32, therefore arithmetic operations are
> multiplied by four. This is clearly undesirable for this case.
>
> Cast it to (void *) first before any calculation.
>
> Below is a sample before/after. The dumped memory is two kprobe slots, the
> first slot has
>
> - c.addiw a0, 0x1c (0x7125)
> - ebreak (0x00100073)
>
> and the second slot has:
>
> - c.addiw a0, -4 (0x7135)
> - ebreak (0x00100073)
>
> Before this patch:
>
> (gdb) x/16xh 0xff20000000135000
> 0xff20000000135000: 0x7125 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x7135 0x0010 0x0000 0x0000
> 0xff20000000135010: 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000
>
> After this patch:
>
> (gdb) x/16xh 0xff20000000125000
> 0xff20000000125000: 0x7125 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000 0x7135 0x0073 0x0010 0x0000
> 0xff20000000125010: 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000 0x0000
>
> Fixes: b1756750a397 ("riscv: kprobes: Use patch_text_nosync() for insn slots")
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index 474a65213657..d2dacea1aedd 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
> p->ainsn.api.restore = (unsigned long)p->addr + len;
>
> patch_text_nosync(p->ainsn.api.insn, &p->opcode, len);
> - patch_text_nosync(p->ainsn.api.insn + len, &insn, GET_INSN_LENGTH(insn));
> + patch_text_nosync((void *)p->ainsn.api.insn + len, &insn, GET_INSN_LENGTH(insn));
> }
>
> static void __kprobes arch_prepare_simulate(struct kprobe *p)
This looks good to me, how did you find this issue?
You can add:
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists