[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241128013424.4096668-10-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:33:36 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
Kechen Lu <kechenl@...dia.com>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Robert Hoo <robert.hoo.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/57] KVM: selftests: Verify KVM stuffs runtime CPUID OS
bits on CR4 writes
Extend x86's set sregs test to verify that KVM sets/clears OSXSAVE and
OSKPKE according to CR4.XSAVE and CR4.PKE respectively. For performance
reasons, KVM is responsible for emulating the architectural behavior of
the OS CPUID bits tracking CR4.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c
index 96fd690d479a..f4095a3d1278 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c
@@ -85,6 +85,16 @@ static void test_cr_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t cr4)
rc = _vcpu_sregs_set(vcpu, &sregs);
TEST_ASSERT(!rc, "Failed to set supported CR4 bits (0x%lx)", cr4);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!!(sregs.cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) ==
+ (vcpu->cpuid && vcpu_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE)),
+ "KVM didn't %s OSXSAVE in CPUID as expected",
+ (sregs.cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) ? "set" : "clear");
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(!!(sregs.cr4 & X86_CR4_PKE) ==
+ (vcpu->cpuid && vcpu_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_OSPKE)),
+ "KVM didn't %s OSPKE in CPUID as expected",
+ (sregs.cr4 & X86_CR4_PKE) ? "set" : "clear");
+
vcpu_sregs_get(vcpu, &sregs);
TEST_ASSERT(sregs.cr4 == cr4, "sregs.CR4 (0x%llx) != CR4 (0x%lx)",
sregs.cr4, cr4);
--
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists