[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024112839-headlock-timothy-4ff7@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:52:49 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@...wei.com>, cve@...nel.org,
linux-cve-announce@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aha310510@...il.com, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-50228: mm: shmem: fix data-race in shmem_getattr()
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 09:29:46PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 10:16:37PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 03:49:44PM +0800, Nanyong Sun wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > Will this CVE be rejected in the future? This patch has introduced a
> > > problem and has been reverted:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241116233053.F1FBAC4CEC3@smtp.kernel.org/T/
> > >
> >
> > What is the git commit id of this change? Is it in Linus's tree yet?
> > And did the original syzbot splat get fixed some other way?
>
> Revert in mainline is d1aa0c04294e29883d65eac6c2f72fe95cc7c049; patch
> had really been pointless and we'd better watch out for its analogues
> being introduced.
>
> IMO "fixes a data-race" in patch description has become a serious red flag
> for review by now. Some of them are valid, some are pointless and occasionally
> actively harmful.
>
Fair enough, now rejected, thanks for the review!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists