[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQK0y_moywsFDsHLPsNZXnZQVJig7dN7J9khVv2gNq414g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:05:12 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Nikola Grcevski <nikola.grcevski@...fana.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] bpf: Refactor bpf_tracing_func_proto()
and remove bpf_get_probe_write_proto()
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:36 AM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:22AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> [..]
> > Moving bpf_base_func_proto() all the way to the top was incorrect,
> > but here we can move it just above this bpf_token_capable() check
> > and remove extra indent like:
> >
> > func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto();
> > if (func_proto)
> > return func_proto;
> > if (!bpf_token_capable(prog->aux->token, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > return NULL;
> > switch (func_id) {
> > case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user:
> >
> > that will align it with the style of bpf_base_func_proto().
> >
> > pw-bot: cr
>
> Ack, let me change that.
>
> Below is preview of v4 for this bit.
lgtm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists