[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d3ed1e8-7294-4927-9aac-daffe6ffef37@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 12:23:05 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: quic_renjiang@...cinc.com, quic_vnagar@...cinc.com,
quic_dikshita@...cinc.com, konradybcio@...nel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] media: venus: Add support for static video
encoder/decoder declarations
On 28.11.2024 11:34 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 28/11/2024 22:14, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 28/11/2024 20:02, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> Bryan,
>>>
>>> I'm still not sure if keeping the logic behind this makes sense at all.
>>>
>>> Could we not just call platform_device_register_data() with a static
>>> configuration of 1 core being enc and the other dec?
>>
>> That's another way to do this. One reason I wrote this series to continue to rely on the existing compat= method though is it stuck in my mind that we have some dependency ordering logic in at the moment.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> commit 08b1cf474b7f72750adebe0f0a35f8e9a3eb75f6
>> Author: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> Date: Fri Feb 5 19:11:49 2021 +0100
>>
>> And the other reason is the prototype platform_device_register_* looks like more surgery and ultimately more validation / potential for bugs.
>>
>> Since this driver is supposed to be moving to maintenance mode, I didn't want to do a more major rewrite of the probe() and remove() paths.
>>
>> ---
>> bod
>>
>
> and.. I wanted to continue support sdm630/sdm660/msm8996/msm8998 without any additional effort to go finding power-domains and clocks which in those cases the existing compat= method actually does something useful.
>
> Also potentially other/new additions to venus which have xcoder specific PDs and clocks would logically want to specify those as we do for the above listed SoCs.
We can just keep a small function to grab these and assign as if they
were specified under the root node (check if video-encoder/video-decoder
both exist, grab the clocks for respective cores and continue normally).
My old series [1] should make it easier to tackle that, feel free to take
it over.
Konrad
[1] https://github.com/somainline/linux/commits/topic/mars
Powered by blists - more mailing lists