[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4310164e-4000-4cff-a093-7986f71fc02a@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:44:57 +0200
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: qcom: common: Add support for power-domain
attachment
On 11/29/24 13:39, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 29/11/2024 11:30, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> + ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &cc->pd_list);
>>
>> Please make a call to the function like this:
>>
>> ret = devm_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, NULL, &cc->pd_list);
>
> Passing &pd_data will cause devm_pd_domain_attach_list() to cycle
> through the power-domains listed and do dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id();
Doesn't it cycle for pd_data.num_pd_names times? Which is zero.
> instead of dv_pm_domain_attach_by_name();
>
> That's what &pd_data is passed here. You want to have that simple
> attachment of the power-domain list.
I look at dev_pm_domain_attach_list() function with my best efforts
to concentrate and see no functional difference between your version
and the one proposed by me since v1.
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists