[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241129082646.1341af16@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:26:46 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl
<aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: More updates for 6.13
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:14:56 -0500
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > The issue appears to be a known GCC bug, though the root cause remains
> > unclear at this time.
> >
> > A potential workaround has been proposed, which you can find here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/202410171059.C2C395030@keescook/
> >
> > However, it seems that the patch has not yet been accepted into the mainline.
>
> I didn't pull that into the audit tree because it isn't a real patch.
> Looking at it again on my phone before today's holiday stuff kicks off, I
> don't have a problem with the workaround, but i do need to see it as a
> proper patch with a commit description, sign off, etc. before I can merge it.
Yeah, from the comment I was expecting to see a proper patch.
>
> For anyone who is going to put together a patch, please make it clear that
> it is a compiler bug and provide the associated bug report links.
If it matters, with that patch applied, all my tests were able to
complete with success.
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists