lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0nNpyBoD5x2M4jn@pc636>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 15:20:23 +0100
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] mm/slub: add sheaf support for batching
 kfree_rcu() operations

Hello!

> On 11/28/24 5:24 PM, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 12:18:19PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> >>> On 11/20/24 13:37, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> >>>> Thank you. Let me try to start moving it into mm/. I am thinking to place
> >>>> it to the slab_common.c file. I am not sure if it makes sense to have a
> >>>> dedicated file name for this purpose.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah sounds good. slub.c is becoming rather large and this should not
> >>> interact with SLUB internals heavily anyway, slab_common.c makes sense.
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >> Got it :)
> >>
> > There is one question. Do you think it works if i do a migration as one
> > big commit? I am asking, because it is easier to go that way.
> 
> Hi, I think one big move is fine. In case there are further adjustments,
> those would be better in separate patches. That makes it easy to review
> the move with git diff --color-moved.
> 
Sounds good and thank you!

--
Uladzislau Rezki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ