[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0nReJHvBJS1IFAz@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:36:40 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] list_lru: expand list_lru_add() docs with info about
sublists
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 09:58:27AM +0100, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> Oh I had not noticed the "Return"/"Return value" change. It must be a
> copy-paste artifact from list_lru_del_obj() which already uses "Return
> value". Would you like me to change that one to 'Return'?
Yes please!
> As for the other rewording, I thought it was slightly more
> unambiguous, but don't feel strongly about it.
I don't feel strongly about it either.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists